Jose “Chille” DeCastro received word on Thursday that his motions for several hearings in his on-going legal trouble in Oklahoma were granted and have been scheduled to be held on June 3, 2026.
DeCastro live streamed himself attempting to gain access to three police vehicles in the parking lot of the Duncan, Oklahoma, police department in September of last year. He claimed that he had the right to do so as he was performing an audit in order to see if the firearms in the car were left in unsecured vehicles.
The diminutive YouTuber immediately reported himself to the police officers on duty at the station and a warrant for his arrest on charges of molesting a police vehicle were filed several months later.
DeCastro sued in Federal court in California initially asking for a stay of the charges while he sued everyone involved with the charges. The emergency intervention was denied and the lawsuit was eventually transferred to Oklahoma.
The YouTuber also fought the charges on a state level, filing multiple motions for hearings in order to challenge the charges and the outstanding warrant. That court did not act on his motions until the State Supreme Court ordered Judge Carrie Hixon to act on the requests earlier this week.
Hixon responded on Thursday by ordering the following motions to be heard on June 3, 2026, at 2PM local time: Motion for Judicial Recusal of Carrie Hixon, Motion to Disqualify District Attorney Dan Jacobsma, Motion for Franks Hearing, Supplemental Motion for Franks hearing, Motion to Deem Motions Confessed and Proposed Order of Dismissal.
It is unclear if DeCastro will attend the hearing in person as he has previously expressed concerns over the active warrant in the state preventing travel. It is unknown whether the court will consider a remote appearance for the Los Angelas based YouTuber.
This comes a day after DeCastro received word that he continues to be in default in his appeal of the dismissal of his lawsuit against Michael “Blue Bacon” Pierattini, Team Skeptic and Daniel Clement in California Superior Court.
The failed Power Ranger had initially voluntarily dropped the lawsuit against Skeptic and Clement without prejudice last year, while Pierattini had charges against him dropped with prejudice by the Judge in the lawsuit. DeCastro eventually changed his mind about dismissing the case and appealed to undo the Judge’s orders to dismiss the lawsuit against the third defendant.
Kate Peter, who is also named in that lawsuit, remains in limbo as she was found by the court clerk to be in default, however, that default was never turned into a default judgment by the court.
DeCastro was originally determined to be in default of the appeal in March as he had not filed the $100.00 fee associated with the appeal and his failure to serve and give proof of service of the notice of appeal.
DeCastro now has until June 2, 2026, to pay the fee and to show proof of service to the defendants or face the possibility of having his appeal dropped.
The inventor of the Jock Sock was live streaming as the news about his Oklahoma hearing broke. In his Thursday afternoon lawsuit, DeCastro announced that the time was coming that all of his channels will be banned for standing up against YouTube and the government.
He told his fans that he would eventually attempt to create a new channel but it would be likely that he will no longer have a channel and will have to have his fans post videos to their channels on his behalf. The YouTuber said he no longer made money off of YouTube, that Rumble is not profitable, and that he would eventually have to open a GoFundMe for his fans to fund his audits and anti-police activities.
This is a breaking news story.
Related Links and PDFS
Video Sources
I think we have a new legal doctrine here. First the patented “Nope” defense from chilli and now, his new theory of law,”I’ve changed my mind.”
He voluntarily says dismiss the case, them he comes back and says, wait, I’ve changed my mind. The only thing surprising here is that chilli expects the judge to go, oh okay then and agree with him. The court is merely going to tell him to refile and dismiss his motion. As for BB, chilli still owes him @16K $ so will the court make his deposit and filing fee to be that amount? We shall soon see.
Next Kate, “Kate is always right” Peter. who was held in default by a clerk and then? Nothing. Failing to pursue a lolsuit is the same as dismissing it. And if it every did go to court, that would be a ground to dismiss at this late stage. chilli does not get to sit on things for whenever he gets around to them.
Lastly, OK ordered a hearing for the fugitive from justice. Will they demand he show in person? Or will they accept a zoom conference. Normally, and OK might have different rules, they do things like this in person. but then chilli is special so they may bend the rules for him. He has 5 motions, so the judge will most likely give him 20-30 minutes to argue each or less and then go down the list and systematically reject each one with sufficient legal justification so that when chilli appeals the superior court will merely dismiss his appeal. Basically, being a Karen and going to the manager has brought the judge into line. Hold the hearing and then dismiss. Gotta give the man his justice. And if the court does have rules where you have to be there in person, not on zoom for this type of hearing, hold that chilli who will not be there in person cannot speak at the hearing or merely dismiss the whole lot as the defendant is not there to pursue the matter. Not really sure what will happen but i would guess, they will hold the hearing. chilli will show up on zoom, the court will tell him he should be there in person and then con tinue to hold the hearing, allowing chilli to rant on each motion as long as he wants to then dismiss them all one by one. The judge will be more concerned with the superior court rebuking them for not doing their job, as they did this time, then ANYTHING chilli might have to say. All of these motions are silly, vexating and a glorified waste of the courts time but when the superior court says to do something, you do it. And do it they will and they will hold a hearing and allow for the creation of a full record, allowing the defendant ample opportunity to be heard and make a record of their motions. And once that is fully done. The court will give full weight to what was said and reject each motion down the line with proper legal precedents such that whenchilli tried to call the manager again, they will get nowhere.
The superior court all but said this; this is a waste of time to hold such a hearing but it is right and proper to hold this hearing as ever dog has its day and seemingly, every motion has it hearing.
What a waste of time.
But i would point out the consistency of chilli, never having won a single court case. Not one.