Hours after our speculation that Jose “Chille” DeCastro would be filing suit against Dale “Lackluster” Hiller, Josh “Accountability for All” Abrams and Kate Peter in a state with a three-year statute of limitations for defamation, DeCastro’s lawsuit appeared in the PACER system as being filed in Boston.
The lawsuit, filed in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, First District Court in Boston, alleges that on June 1, 2022, Hiller, Peter and Abrams appeared on a livestream hosted by Abrams.
During the livestream, DeCastro alleges that defendant Abrams accused the trio of the following:
“He falsely alleged that Plaintiff strangled someone. Abrams then stated that Plaintiff went to a friend’s house in New Hampshire, kicked his friend out, told him to go stay in a hotel, and then used the home to do drugs. Abrams claimed that the friend returned at 6:00 a.m., found drug paraphernalia scattered throughout the house, and then kicked Plaintiff out. He also accused Plaintiff of creating fake app screen designs – referred to as “pillow poppers” – in collaboration with his cousin, in order to fraudulently obtain a large investment from an investor. Abrams additionally accused Plaintiff of blackmailing people.
Abrams also accused Plaintiff of using his credit card without permission to pay for a hotel room.
Abrams also edited video footage of Plaintiffs interaction with Defendant Kate Peter in a misleading way. He removed critical context showing that Defendant Peter stepped on the back of Plaintiffs shoes, which caused Plaintiff to lean backward defensively. Abrams presented a slowed-down version of Plaintiffs reaction, making it appear aggressive. In the same video, Abrams stated, “All I’m guilty of is pausing the video,” downplaying the extent of the edits. This misleading presentation distorted the truth and contributed to the negative public perception of Plaintiff.
Defendant Hiller stated: “There are victims. There is proof of it. That’s all I can say for now. Hopefully more will be revealed.”
Defendant Kate Peter stated: “He also employs blackmail and extortion and threats a lot,” and further alleged that Plaintiff operates a Ponzi scheme. She described this supposed scheme as one in which Plaintiff solicits funds from new investors to pay off previous investors, suggesting criminal fraud and financial deception.”
DeCastro is seeking the following:
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court: a. Award compensatory damages in the amount of $1,000,000.00, divided as: i. $400,000.00 for reputational harm and loss of professional opportunity; ii. $300,000.00 for emotional distress; iii. $300,000.00 for general damages related to public stigma and future earning loss; b. Award punitive dan1ages for willful and malicious conduct; c. Award costs, and pro se legal fees at $400/hour for research, drafting, and filing; d. Grant any additional relief the Court deems just and proper.
This is a breaking news story.
LOL
and?
This is the big lawsuit?
What follows is not legal advice. Go ask Merb for that. Not a fcuking usenet troll
It is self refuting.
Meaning?
1) Line 10, using Abrams Credit Card without permission… Then chilli sent him 205$ to pay for the credit card that chilli used to pay for his hotel room. He said vs he said. It was his credit card and you paid him back, he says without permission, you say with… No possible way to prove this.
2) Line 12, calling something deliberately vague and ominous does not state a fact but something like a shadow of a fact. Come back when he states things as if they were facts not vague words that upset chilli
3) Now on to Kate… Line 14, and perhaps the best of all claims… chill showing his legal genius says Kate was speculating and said she had not verified her claims. Errr…. Speculating is not defamation. I speculate chilli is a moron, oh wait proven by his own filings. I speculate he abused his dogs. But I have no proof. Hence the word speculate. He refutes himself within his very own claim. I think chili is a dick, but i have never undressed him to see if he is a richard or not. Did i insult him. Yes, defame him? No, because anyone reading the full sentence in context will see I am merely opining and not stating as fact. It is an opinion because I say that I have never done anything to prove what I say is in fact, fact.
But wait, this gets better…
4) line 1 states he is publicly known as… so he is claiming to be a public figure. Yes out boy chilli just messed himself all over this filing. If he is a public figure, the rules are different. The burden shifted from the three defendants onto chill to prove their acts where knowingly, willfully malicious.
We laugh and go into the fact he would have to show how he was damaged by showing real loses which he was supposed to do in his Cali case against BB and the same defendants. But failed to do.
He added 2, not one but 2! afidavides that are worthless on their face. No contact information given means they can just be ignored. And it gets better. chilli by asserting that these two people are the ones they were talking about, to the exclusion of all others cannot then change tactics later on to say oh they meant someone else. Let me go get their denial.
Brains and trains
He asked for a slow one.
If he ever serves anyone just write a letter to the judge as Sovereign citizen
Use you name and say by special appearance. You challenge the venue, challenge your appearance and filings refused to state a judicial claim.
Sign it and forget it.
Let chilli prove to a judge this is the proper anything. Using Chat GPT having worked SOOOOOOO well for him in all his other cases. I am sure this will work fine and dandy.
Or, do what Kate has already done. Ignore him.
Do not do a BB and try to argue anything in the filing as wrong or present your side of the issues. That can wait until later.
Oh and get a lawyer, Don’t pay him 75 K like kate did for Wish and find out he spent it all, what a surprise.