Lane MYERS Blames Everyone But Himself For Probation Violations in New Interview

Saturday saw a return to the fantasy filled world of legal scholar, bicycling influencer, YouTube wunderkind and Josh “This is a Public Service” Grey’s sole reason for waking up in the morning, Lane Myers who did yet another interview from the Pima County Adult Detention Center where he blamed our reporter, the victim, and anyone else but himself for his own actions that led to alleged violations of his probation.

Myers did another interview with Zachary “Liberty Troll” Kueker, which was pre-recorded some time in the past week, from his cell in the detention center. The YouTuber has been there since July when he was taken into custody for alleged violations that included threatening to go to the workplace of his victim, who has a protective order against him.

The sometime spandex clad owner of a mountain bicycling tour company stuck to his recent script of denying that he violated probation, but if he did violate, it wasn’t a violation if the victim didn’t know about his actions and the victim would not know about his actions unless our own JudyYouGotThis had told the victim:

They have a small circle because obviously they know that what they do causes people to not appreciate them or s you know and so they prosecutors just it’s like cops. They don’t really have friends outside of other cops because they know that like it’s like we know that we’re doing shit that people don’t agree with So it’s like we can’t have friends ’cause they would give us a re you know, your friends are supposed to be like, Hey bro, what are you doing? But they make sure that all their friends are like, Oh, you’re doing great, you’re doing great ’cause all their friends are prosecutors ‘Cause it or construction workers ’cause everything to them, they’re hammer, everything’s a nail, right?

And so he did say that (the victim) doesn’t watch any of the videos, only he does. Well that’s funny If (the victim) doesn’t watch the videos, only he does, shouldn’t he be the victim? So if the victim doesn’t watch the videos, how can she be harassed by it?

Continuing:

So uh So my lawyer was like, well, how did she she can even know he’s making videos? Well he said, well she doesn’t watch any of his videos, she doesn’t watch his channel. But Juji from really cool news got a hold of (his victim) and said, Oh, he’s making these videos he might want to watch, blah blah blah.

So to me Judy is harassing because According to (the victim’s husband), on the stand, he said (the victim) was not aware I was even making YouTube videos because she doesn’t watch my channel. It wasn’t until Judy reached out to her and let her know So hold on. Judy reached out to (the victim) and let her know that I was on YouTube again.

Not somebody harassing her. But suddenly Judy reaches out to her now she now (the victim’s husband)’s watching. Well, they’re saying that if Judy doesn’t reach out, then she doesn’t watch Sounds like Judy’s the the should be on trial, right?

To me. Sounds like Judy should be in handcuffs in an orange jumpsuit. Art fighting charges.

Because Judy’s the one that’s brought their attention, they being (the victim) and (the victim’s husband). So (the victim) got (the victim) and Judy went back and forth and then (the victim’s husband) started watching everything and Judy helps him with thumbnails and shit. They admitted all this in court Then they said that or he said, (the victim’s husband) said, that uh he claims uh He didn’t see the motion to modify until June fourteenth.

And then he went back and looked on this as a public service and saw that he had posted it on June 7th. But what they don’t realize is I tried to post it or tried to file it on June 8th and I got rejected because I had to make some changes to it because it wasn’t in the text searchable format and the case numbers were formatted wrong and shit like that But they just like to uh they just like to lie. So then he says that Judy brought it to his attention and he went to Illuminate the Dark channel.

Addressing terms of his probation that keep him from saying his victim’s name in social media postings, Myers tried a new line of reasoning:

So I guess we’ll find out because he said in open court She doesn’t even know what information means. Does it mean their name or does it mean something their address? So from now on we’re just gonna use their names until we find out.

Not one time in court did (the victim’s husband) say the victim. He said, my wife (the victim), my wife (the victim), my wife (the victim). Or you know, (the victim’s husband), (the victim’s husband).

Nobody I did not hear anybody say the victim. Ten hours of testimony. They they said they said uh even my probation officer said he doesn’t know if that means I can say their name or not So nobody said I couldn’t, so I’m gonna be respectful.

Would they rather call me for have me calling professional victims and liars and all that? Or would they rather just have you I’ll just use their name? I’m I’m gonna use exactly what the court is using.

I’m using what Rachel Styles is using, I’m using what the judge is using, I’m using what they use when they talk. Their name is (the victim) and (the victim’s husband). And so if they’re if that’s what we’re gonna use in court Then that’s what we’re gonna use when we talk about the case because that’s what they’re using.

I’m gonna call ’em it seems like they want to be called (the victim’s husband) or (the victim).

Addressing future plans, Myers stated:

Uh we’re taking a new tactic. We’re just gonna do a special action. We’re gonna uh file an appeal of my motion uh my conditions approbation.

We’re gonna we’re gonna argue to the appeal court that they’re it’s an interlocutory appeal. We’re gonna argue that the conditions are um unconstitutional So once we get our ruling, the so once the appeal court says yeah, these conditions they’re unconstitutional, you can’t stop them from saying somebody’s name or or talking about his case or doing an interview. And he hasn’t there’s no evidence he talked to uh public service.

You’re just coming up with some Oh, one of the violations w uh was they said that because the public service was posting my fundraiser, that’s us communicating I think that’s insane. That’s the level of insanity here. So so I’m not allowed to talk to the public service.

But if he posts my fundraiser That’s us communicating part.

And that’s why they don’t want this to be that’s why they don’t want audio. They don’t want ten hours of audio on YouTube of them getting just destroyed. My probation officer got destroyed. They put my wife in there to talk about divorce court, and now we’ve been cooking Matt Walker like like he’s never like kangaroo fresh kangaroo meat.

Finally, Myers turned his attention to his fundraising efforts:

How can a give send go be a violation of probation? They made me take it down. That’s insane to me Rip Metcalf I brought it up to Metcalf and he didn’t say I can’t do that so I don’t see why I couldn’t. That’s the level of stupidity they’re going to here saying I can’t have a fundraiser.

Why wouldn’t why would I not be able to have a fundraiser as a condition of probation? And they said it was because when I talk about my fundraiser, I’m talking about my case. Because you know my fundraiser is about my case.

So then they say, well if he has a fundraiser for his case, he’s talking about his case and that’s profiting off his case. It’s not even profit. I’m not making any money.

I in fact I’m losing money, so I don’t know what they’re talking about.

Myers’ GiveSendGo account was silent for Sunday, recently taking in a single $2,000.00 donation from a supporter. Adian “Turtleboy” Kearney won the day with total donations of $11,125.00.

No other campaigns that we follow saw donations for the day.

[Full disclosure: Mr. Myers has both threatened to sue and/or to file an injunction against ReallyCoolNews. If you’d like to contribute to our fund set up to fight possible legal action/keep the lights on/keep the cats fed, our GoFundMe is located at https://www.gofundme.com/f/reallycoolsite-ongoing-expenses.]