James “James Freeman” Springer’s (Freeman) appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit was voluntarily dismissed on Wednesday as Freeman seeks relief from the lower court.
Upon dismissal of the appeal, the case returned to the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico where Freeman filed a motion to reconsider her recent order denying Freeman’s Oppossed Second Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, which she denied earlier in the week.
Attorney A. Blair Dunn, representing Freeman, used the dismissal to ask for reconsideration as part of Judge Margaret Strickland’s ruling questioned if her court had the authority to rule on the motion as it was already in front of the appeals court. Dunn added no arguments in his motion for reconsideration and centered on the fact that the case is no longer in front of the appeals court.
Dunn ignored Judge Strikland’s other points in her ruling, including the fact that the Judge ruled that Dunn did not establish the minimum legal grounds to obtain a favorable ruling for a permanent injunction and restraining order.
Freeman is seeking the removal of an order preventing him from visiting court houses in New Mexico’s Seventh District without a police escort. He recently added conspiracy charges to his claims against the Seventh District alleging that members of the Court were conspiring with YouTube to have his live streams removed from the service.
This is a developing story.
