DeleteLawZ Faces Major Problems in Five Lawsuits

The absence of Jose “Chille” DeCastro from livestreaming has left a void in his fans hearts as he is tending to family matters and not enlightening their lives with 3+ hour diatribes on the evils of modern policing.

DeCastro’s absence, however, is not without controversy as he has several deadlines and an entire missing board game that may have his fans overly concerned.

His Constitution HQ board game tops the list for currently promised but missing items. Originally promised for a Thanksgiving 2025 release, it soon slipped to Christmas 2024, then January, February, March, April and May 2025.

In late May, DeCastro changed the release date to September on a new product page that also promises an April 2025 release date and a May 2025 release date for the Teacher’s edition.

By early June, DeCastro had backed off on any promises for shipping as it was revealed that the game was incomplete and he did not have a backer to provide him with the $150,000.00 he needed for the initial print run.

Late May was also a bad time for DeCastro’s on-going lawsuit in California Superior Court against Michael “Blue Bacon” Pierattini, Kate Peter, Team Skeptic and Daniel Clement. DeCastro had filed to dismiss the case without prejudice to the opposition of Pierattini, who was seeking terminating sanctions against DeCastro along with DeCastro to be held accountable for the monetary sanctions he’s received during the lawsuit.

A late May court date was supposed to end in settlement talks between the two parties, but after a month, no deal has been agreed to. The next hearing in the case was set for July 14 and in a telling sign, the trial date setting hearing is focusing on Kate Peter instead of Pierattini.

Peter was found in default by the court clerk for not responding to DeCastro’s summons in 2023. Judge H. Jay Ford III never proceeded with hearings on the default, which could turn it into a default judgement. Peter herself has contested the default in public, stating that she was not properly served in the case.

DeCastro’s lawsuit against former Justice of the Peace Ann Zimmerman and Judge Michelle Leavitt is also at a standstill. DeCastro is suing in Las Vegas over Zimmerman’s alleged violation of his rights when she had him searched before a court hearing and Leavitt’s refusal to have a hearing to set him free of a conviction by Zimmerman during the appeals process.

While DeCastro had filed the lawsuit back in May, he seems to be dragging his feet with the case, only filing for electronic services access and his certificate of interested parties last week.

He had twice announced that he would be serving all the parties in the case “next week” and gave various numbers on how much money he’d need from his fans to fund the service. As of week’s end, no service has been made to any of the parties DeCastro is currently suing.

DeCastro’s latest lawsuit against Dale “Lackluster” Hiller, Josh “Accountability for All” Abrams and Kate Peter is also at a standstill. When DeCastro filed the suit in early June, he claimed he put the wrong date in for the incident, which would have the incident’s statute of limitations pass before he filed the case.

He asked for and was granted the ability to update the complaint with the correct filing date back on June 11, 2025. To date, no corrected complaint has been filed, no summons has been filed to any of the parties, nor has DeCastro updated his supposed planned talks with Hiller for a settlement in the case.

In possibly a huge blunder on his part, DeCastro’s lawsuit against the City of Ironton, Ohio, and Lawrence County, Ohio, currently may be falling apart due to an unforced error.

The Lawrence County defendants filed to have their motion to dismiss granted this week after DeCastro has failed to respond to the motion for over two months. While technically, DeCastro was originally granted a month more to respond to their motion, the deadline for the extension passed over a month ago, leaving his the defendants in limbo.

Long time followers of the original case have stated that they’re having flashbacks to that case. In that case, DeCastro failed to respond to multiple orders to show cause against the Lawrence County defendants and ultimately, had his case dismissed based on his failure to do so.

Finally, inexplicably as DeCastro still employs Michael Mee to represent him in the case, his lawsuit against the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department hit a snag last week as Judge Andrew P. Gordon rejected the dueling proposed pretrial orders submitted by the parties in the lawsuit.

Gordon had ordered the parties to come together to file a join proposed pretrial order by June 20, 2025. Under local rules 16-3 and 16-4, the burden was on DeCastro’s attorney to take the lead in preparing the document.

According to the filing by the LVMPD’s attorney, their portion of the document was submitted to DeCastro’s team by June 16, 2025. When they did not hear back by June 20, they filed their individual motion.

Michael Mee, filing his own document for DeCastro, blamed the LVMPD and said that he had not heard from the LVMPD by June 20, despite their claim otherwise, and was forced to file his own document as the LVMPD’s attorney was unable to meet with him at the last minute.

Mee now has until July 14, 2025, to submit the proposed joint pre-trial order.