Chille DeCastro FIGHTS Back Against Oklahoma Warrant (Again)

The end of March and the start of the new month saw Jose “Chille” DeCastro file a second attempt to get emergency relief to quash a warrant out of Duncan, Oklahoma, along with an amended complaint in the same lawsuit.

DeCastro petitioned the Court of Criminal Appeals for the state of Oklahoma to issue a Writ of Mandamus forcing the state court to:

1. Perform their ministerial duty to SIGN the Confessed Proposed Order dismissing Case No. CM-2025-00530 WITH PREJUDICE immediately upon receipt of this Court’s order;
2. Immediately recall and revoke the void misdemeanor arrest warrant issued December 10, 2025;
3. Direct the immediate recall of the warrant and notification of all relevant law enforcement databases, including the National Crime Information Center; and
4. Zero all financial records and ‘Amounts Owed’ currently listed on the OSCNIODCR docket to end the unlawful maintenance of costs and fees on a void judgment.

DeCastro claimed in the filing, filed with the criminal appeals court on March 16 then included in his federal filing on March 30, “Petitioner is a California resident who cannot safely travel to or through Oklahoma while this void warrant remains active. Because the warrant is entered in the National Crime Information Center and related state law enforcement databases, Petitioner is subject to arrest in any jurisdiction in the United States at any time. This is an ongoing illegal restraint of liberty that no ordinary appeal can timely remedy.”

He argued that he made several filings in the criminal proceedings but has yet to hear anything back from the court. He also stated that he could not be charged with molesting three police vehicles, stemming from an incident in September of last year where he filmed himself pulling on the door handles of three police vehicles, as he didn’t actually damage or gain access to the vehicles.

The diminutive YouTuber also updated his complaint in the federal lawsuit. He is now seeking:

Declaratory Relief

1. A declaration that Defendants violated Plaintiffs rights under the First and Fourth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
2. A declaration that Information CM-2025-00530 was initiated and has been maintained in violation of the First and Fourth Amendments.
3. A declaration that the September 9, 2025 probable cause affidavit was obtained through material omissions in violation of Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978).
4. A declaration that the circumstances surrounding the notarization of the September 9, 2025 affidavit raise serious questions about whether Oklahoma notary impartiality requirements were satisfied.
5. A declaration that the three-month delay between the preparation of the affidavit and the filing of charges, timed to coincide with Plaintiffs public records requests, reflects retaliatory motive. 6. A declaration that Jacobsma’s administrative inaction in response to notice of the constitutional defects and First Amendment retaliation evidence identified herein constitutes deliberate indifference to Plaintiffs rights under the First and Fourth Amendments.
6. A declaration that the City of Duncan maintains unconstitutional customs of retaliating against individuals who investigate and report on police misconduct.

Injunctive Relief

8. A temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65, ordering, based on the constitutional violations alleged herein: (a) that Defendants, including District Attorney Dan Jacobsma, are enjoined from continuing prosecution of Case No. CM-2025-00530; (b) that the arrest warrant issued in connection with that case is stayed and its enforcement enjoined; ( c) that all Defendants are prohibited from arresting, detaining, or prosecuting Plaintiff based on his September 8, 2025 conduct; and ( d) that all Defendants are enjoined from taking any retaliatory action against Plaintiff in response to his constitutionally protected activity.
9. A permanent injunction, upon final judgment, based on the constitutional violations established herein, making the foregoing temporary relief permanent and additionally requiring: (a) that the City of Duncan adopt written policies protecting the right to observe and photograph police activity in public spaces; (b) that Duncan personnel receive training on the First Amendment standards established in Irizarry v. Yehia, 38 F.4th 1282 (10th Cir. 2022); (c) that Duncan adopt written policies prohibiting retaliatory law enforcement action against individuals who submit public records requests; and ( d) that Duncan personnel receive training on notary impartiality requirements under Oklahoma law.

Monetary Relief

10. Compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial for: the ongoing prosecution and active arrest warrant; the threat of imprisonment; chilling of constitutionally protected speech and news gathering; the effect of the outstanding warrant on Plaintiffs liberty and movement; emotional distress; reputational harm; economic losses attributable to the suppression of Plaintiffs journalism; and expenses incurred in connection with the unconstitutional prosecution.
11. Punitive damages against Defendants Smith, Newman, Fitzhugh, Hammond, Attaway, and Jacobsma in their individual capacities, for conduct undertaken with knowledge of, or reckless disregard for, Plaintiffs clearly established constitutional rights.

Additional Relief

12. An award of reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1988.
13. Pre- and post-judgment interest as permitted by law.
14. Such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.

April Fool’s day saw no new donations towards DeCastro’s few remaining GoFundMe campaigns.

Zachary “Liberty Troll” Kueker won the day with $300.00 in new donations going to his Stand with Liberty Against Unjust Charges fund.

The First Amendment Protection Agency took second place with $50.00 in new donations towards his ILLEGAL ARREST DEFENSE FUND!!!

Jonathan Hudon-Huneault placed third with $21.00 in new value going towards his Help us Fight this anti-free speech retaliation lawsuit.

For the second day of the month, Hudon-Huneault taking in $39.00 in new donations to take first place.

The First Amendment Protection Agency took second place with $15.00 in new donations.

No other campaigns that we follow had donations for either day.

DeCastro’s Monofold item remains a low selling item as he managed to sell a single unit for the week, bringing total sales of his individual monofold to 7. His two monofold package remains at two sales while his three monofold package has stagnated at four total sales.

Sales figures are based on DeCastro’s available stock listings on his YouVeGotBail.ai website.