27 Pages of Fury! Frauditor Troll’s Attorney BLASTS DMA’s Attorney’s Motion for Remote Appearance

In perhaps one of the most bizarre filings of the year, “Sinsational” Simon Lin, writing on behalf of Jonathan “Frauditor Troll” Hudon-Huneault, filed 27 pages of opposition to a simple request by Christopher “Denver Metro Audits” Cordova’s attorney That Randall S. “The Unhinged Attorney” Newman, Esq., to appear via Zoom at an upcoming hearing.

At face value, Newman’s original request seems reasonable. He’s now traveling to Asia and he lives in Florida. The April 14, 2026, hearing on the Defendants’ Motion for Dismissal for forum non conveniens or alternatively posting of a bond, could be done via remote appearance despite Lin’s initial objections.

Lin’s late Monday filing, consisting of five pages of arguments and a 22-page declaration, argues that Lin will be presenting physical evidence at the hearing that would be difficult to present via ZOOM call. He also contends that Newman’s request proves their point that California is the wrong venue to hear the lawsuit and that Newman can easily attend because his new law firm “has offices across the country, including in San Diego, California.”

According to Lin’s filing and exhibits, Newman is now a partner in the firm of Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz as proved by a screen shot provided by a listing on “Bloomberg.”

Lin’s accusations brought about a swift response from Newman, who wrote in a filing on Tuesday:

“Defendants’ Opposition asserts that Plaintiff’s counsel is a partner in the law firm Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP (“WHAFH”) and suggests that counsel is located in New York and has access to WHAFH’s offices in San Diego, California. Those assertions are incorrect and do not reflect counsel’s current status.

Plaintiff’s counsel: (1) Is not a partner or otherwise employed by WHAFH and has not been employed by that firm since April 2020; (2) Does not have access to any WHAFH office in San Diego, California; (3) Does not control or work out of any office in San Diego, California; and (4) Maintains an office at 270 Madison Avenue, 10th Floor in New York, New York which is rented office space and is not indicative of any affiliation with WHAFH.

Defendants’ assertions regarding Plaintiff’s counsel’s affiliation with WHAFH are based on outdated or incorrect third-party information.

Counsel is not located in New York. Although counsel maintains an office in New York, he does not reside there. Counsel resides in Florida and spends substantial portions of the year in Southeast Asia. Counsel is presently located in Bangkok, Thailand, where he remains for extended periods. As a result, attending an in-person hearing would require international travel. Counsel is not available to appear in person on April 14, 2026.”

Lin’s opposition and declaration also contain statements that Hudon-Huneault routinely deletes videos from his channel and the 1700 videos Hudon-Huneault has admitted deleting as part of an effort to stop further lawsuits was part of a routine process by the YouTuber.

However, Lin also asserted that Newman needed to be in person for the April 14 hearing as he was going to be playing portions of the videos in question, despite previous claims by Hudon-Huneault that he did not have copies of these videos and Lin’s own inability to turn those videos over during the discovery process.

Lin also takes Newman to task as, “After the Motion was filed, Plaintiff requested a meet-and-confer to demand production of 68 videos based on a list of unknown origin. Plaintiff claims that those 68 videos infringed his copyrighted works, but fails to identify which of Plaintiff’s works was allegedly infringed. It is unclear whether Plaintiff has the legal standing to raise those copyright claims when the work is not even identified to begin with. This initiative seeks to expand this case thirty-fold from 2 videos to 68 videos.”

Again, Lin chastises Newman for problems identifying videos that allegedly infringed on Cordova’s copyrighted works but fails to hold his client responsible for deleting said works and creating the problems in the first place.

Lin and Newman’s filings come as the parties released a joint Discovery statement indicating the current problems they’re having with discovery. Both versions of the document are included in the text version of this news report. Please note that the second version of the document is the same as the first version but has had two exhibits attached to it for unknown reasons.

We will continue to monitor this situation and provide more updates as more information becomes available.