LVMPD Rebuts Summary Judgment Claims

The Las Vegas Metro Police Department responded on Monday to Jose “Chille” DeCastro’s response to their second motion for summary judgment, which is seeking to dismiss two of the claims made against them.

While most of DeCastro’s case was dismissed between a ruling last year by Judge Andrew Gordon and the last summary judgment earlier this year, the issues at hand involve DeCastro’s arrest now that an appeals court threw out his conviction from the charges he was arrested for in Las Vegas back in March of 2023.

DeCastro’s position is that the police had no right to arrest him now that the charges were thrown out. He also says he shouldn’t have been searched because the whole arrest was unwarranted, and the search was then an invasion of his privacy.

In this motion, the LVMPD is rebutting DeCastro’s reply to their motion for summary judgment. DeCastro’s counter argument involves the conviction being overturned and also claims that the arresting officers do not have qualified immunity for the arrest and should be held financially liable for their actions.

The LVMPD’s response claimed that the arresting officer had every right to arrest DeCastro for interfering with his crime scene. DeCastro refused to follow commands at the scene, was obstinate and confessed that he had been arrested multiple times for the same sort of incidents.

As for the search, it was part of the arresting process. Before DeCastro, who had made threatening comments towards the officers and was already involved in a scuffle with the arresting officer, was placed in a police vehicle, a search was warranted by police procedure for the safety of everyone involved.

The LVMPD also contended that even in a scenario where DeCastro’s arrest was made in bad faith, the arresting officer’s immunity still applied under Nevada Revised Statute 41.032.

NRS 41.032 states, ““no action may be brought’ against any public officer based upon ‘the failure to exercise or perform a discretionary function … whether or not the discretion involved is abused.”

Should the LVMPD succeed in their request for summary judgment on this set of charges, the arresting officers in the case will still face trial on DeCastro’s claims of excessive use of force.

The trial is expected to be held in the spring of next year.

Share this post:

Related Posts

Bad week for DeleteLawZ! He screws up and refuses to participate in hearing in his own lawsuit against Blue Bacon! Judge punts court dates and orders his lawyer to get his act together! Long Island Audits is also having a bad week! His attempts to revive a dead case in Illinois failed, his lawyer quit, and he’s putting all his hopes and dreams into a backdated appeal of the verdict in the case! Scare for Carolina in Fort Worth! Short retrial hearing becomes two-hour ordeal as new Judge hammers her attempts for a retrial in case that saw national news coverage! Plus: DeleteLawZ’s “Constitutional Law Scholar” game is now “Constitution Headquarters,” what the what? Was “Project Constitution” taken? All this and more on this edition of Auditing Insanity!

In a case where the defense has complained about Jose “Chille” DeCastro doing everything possible to delay or obstruct proceedings even after sanctions and warnings by the Judge, DeCastro made the unusual choice not to file an opposition motion required for Friday’s sanctions hearing, delaying the case yet again.

Fans of Jose “Chille” DeCastro learned that the much promised “tomorrow” launch of his game now meant a launch “four to six weeks” or “ninety days” depending on DeCastro’s conflicting information, while pre-sales launched on Thursday before his efforts to playtest the game began.

Fans of Jose “Chille” DeCastro asked on Monday when a deadline of “tomorrow” actually meant “anytime between the moment I say it and never, depending on how (allegedly) high I am?” as the YouTuber missed another self-announced deadline in relation to his Constitutional Law Scholar board game.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore