Afterglow: DeleteLawZ Promises More Motions

Jose “Chille” DeCastro was upbeat and a bit threatening in his first livestream on Wednesday after filing his federal defamation lawsuit against Kate Peter, Josh Abrams, and Dale “Lackluster” Hiller.

DeCastro was excited and used over exaggerated fist pumps to show his appreciation to fans during the broadcast as his fans showered him with super chat messages and gifted memberships.

Clearly out of the “brain fog” that he said had hampered his ability to participate in his outstanding lawsuits over the past year, the excited DeCastro waved around a new motion he said had taken him three hours to produce and promised that it would shock and surprise those it was aimed at.

He further backed his stance as he claimed that he was proud of his new suit against Peter, Abrams and Hiller, and that he met with a “super lawyer” in California who gave the lawsuit his seal of approval.

DeCastro received compliments from YouTube personality Patrick J. D’Arcy on Wednesday, a Bonafide lawyer, for tightening up his phrasing in the lawsuit, but also received harsh criticism from D’Arcy for missing key elements of the suit, jumps in logic and formatting issues.

The key flaw pointed out by D’Arcy and other critics comes in the fact that DeCastro alleges that the events happened in a livestream that aired “on or about” June 1, 2022. The lawsuit was filed June 3, 2025, which is outside of the statute of limitations if the events actually occurred on June 1, 2022.

While DeCastro may argue that he actually filed earlier and the paperwork took forever to show up in the system, the fact remains that if the defendants can prove that the statute of limitations has passed before the filing of the lawsuit, the lawsuit is more than likely dead in the water.

With the huge flaw exposed to the world, DeCastro avoided mentioning said flaw as he hyped his lawsuit. He warned that he had devastating material in video form that would expose Peter, Hiller and Abram’s “dirty laundry” if they refused to immediately settle the case.

DeCastro let his audience know that he was withholding the devastating material as he needed to “follow the court’s procedure to give the people a chance to settle” before exposing them with his new video release.

This statement apparently served as the reasoning as to why DeCastro scheduled and canceled a livestream explaining why he was suing the trio on Tuesday, along with releasing a video with a similar title to his main Delete LawZ and Delete LawZ Clips channels Tuesday night before making the video private.

The YouTuber assured his fans that he would punish anyone who harmed him with lawsuits in the future. He also touted his fact that he “won” an unspecified lawsuit last year, and had a ticket overturned in another legal action last year, indicating that his legal battles resulted in actual wins after years of losses.

DeCastro again chose to ignore his on-going legal battle with Michael “Blue Bacon” Pierattini, who DeCastro is in settlement talks to end his on-going California Superior Court lawsuit related to actions Pierattini supposedly took as an alleged member of Kate Peter’s “Masshole Troll Army.”

Pierattini again indicated that he would not accept DeCastro’s terms on Wednesday. The Washington State based YouTuber added in a public comment on our own ReallyCoolNewsWire Discord form that DeCastro apparently threatened him with inclusion in the new lawsuit should he not accept DeCastro’s demands to dismiss the case.

Observers also noted that DeCastro has made no mention of his Constitution HQ board game or the teaching sessions he promised he would be filming instead of anti-police livestreams.

Presales for the game are no longer featured on DeCastro’s main DeleteLawZ.com page. A click through to the merchandise area reveals that while DeCastro does list the “presale” on his merchandise page, the counter for sales of the game have been stuck at “9999” since updated the listing to its new $89.00 price point last week.

DeCastro also has not provided updates on the financing meetings that he claimed he had set up to fund the $150,000.00 he needed to produce the first printing of the game. This continues the apparent decline in DeCastro’s interest in the game, since his focus now seems to be making money off of his multiple federal lawsuits.

On Wednesday, DeCastro provided an update to his newly filed federal lawsuit against Justice of the Peace Ann Zimmerman and others related to his conviction and acquittal of obstruction an officer and interference in a traffic stop last year.

He said he had paid $360.00 to a process server to serve all of the defendants in the lawsuit, and all would be served next week. DeCastro then urged his fans to donate to his GoFundMe account, which he managed to pin to the top of his side chat, in order to reimburse him for his expenses.

DeCastro’s promotion of the GoFundMe campaign brought much needed attention to his crowdsourcing efforts.

Wednesday’s crowdsourcing results saw no donations for DeCastro as our own Ongoing Expenses campaign took the title for the day with a $360.00 donation. This was followed by Craig Hendry’s To Support Craig’s work with a $20.00 donation.

After DeCastro’s efforts to promote his campaign Wednesday, he won Thursday’s tally with donations totally $40.00. These were the first donations to his campaign in nearly a week and a direct result of his mention on his livestream.

Lane Myers took second for the day with a $25.00 donation. No other campaigns saw donations for the day.

This is an on-going news story.