Judge Margaret Strickland ruled against James “James Freeman” Springer’s (Freeman) second request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against New Mexico’s Seventh District court on Tuesday.
This is Freeman’s second request for the court to temporarily block the Seventh District’s ruling that prevents him from entering courthouses in the Sevent District without a police escort. The first was denied by Judge Strickland and is currently being appealed by Freeman in the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals.
The second attempt to block the orders included a request to bar members of the Seventh District Court from reporting his videos to YouTube, alleging a conspiracy between YouTube and the Court to silence Freeman.
In denying Freeman’s motions, Judge Strickland reminded Freeman that by his own admission, he had the videos in question restored and suffered no permanent harm by actions taken by the tech giant.
The Judge also ruled that Freeman offered no proof that anyone involved with the Seventh District Court had anything to do with the YouTube report. She stated that she could not act on Freeman’s speculation and that he failed to prove the minimum criteria for her to grant his request.
This is a breaking news story.
