ReallyCoolNews
Saturday, June 13, 2026
  • Login
  • Home
  • News
  • Music
  • Comics
  • Ratfarts!
  • Site News
  • Support Our Site
    • Animal Needs Campaign
    • CashApp Donation
    • GoFundMe Donation
    • PayPal Donation
    • StreamElements Tip
No Result
View All Result
ReallyCoolNews
No Result
View All Result

Chille DeCastro Gets Big Motion Wins in Court in Nevada, Allowed Early Discovery

by Jim
March 26, 2026
in News
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
0
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Video thumb

Diminutive YouTuber and candidate for “Government” of California Jose “Chille” DeCastro got a number of rare wins on Wednesday with a Judge granting motions he filed, a court clerk apparently reviving his appeal of a case against Michael “Blue Bacon” Pierattini, and his attorney miraculously filing opposition to the awarding attorneys’ fees on time, no less!

Starting with the appeal in the Pierattini case. DeCastro is appealing his own decision to voluntarily dismiss the portions of the lawsuit against defendants Daniel Clement and Team Skeptic without prejudice along with the Judge’s decision to dismiss Michael “Blue Bacon” Pierattini from the case with prejudice and to award sanctions to Pierattini.

DeCastro originally filed his notice of appeal in November of last year and the case would later go through a change of assigned judges. During this time, the Court Clerk did not file DeCastro’s notice of appeal. The Court Clerk published it on March 24, 2026, along with DeCastro’s change of address notice.

It is unclear how this impacts DeCastro’s appeal as several important deadlines have been missed to appeal the case to California’s Second Circuit Appeals Court.

In DeCastro’s on-going lawsuit against Clark County, Nevada, he filed his opposition to a motion by defendants Clark County and Assistant District Attorney Agnes Botelho to stay the discovery process while their motion to dismiss the case is heard.

DeCastro essentially responds by saying that discovery cannot be stayed as Clark Count, which he is suing in its personal capacity, is indeed a person under the law and has retaliated against police critics.

He also claims that Botelho’s prosecutorial immunity is in question as she errored while performing “investigative or administrative functions” and that since both of these are issues, it is likely that the defendants won’t win their motion to dismiss and discovery should proceed.

In his defense against the request for court costs and attorney fees in his failed lawsuit against the LVMPD, DeCastro’s attorney, Michael Mee, weighs heavily into the argument that the jury got the verdict wrong and that there were several errors by everyone else that would prevent them from being awarded attorney’s fees.

The motion essentially rehashes the entire case, includes references to DeCastro’s conviction and subsequent acquittal on charges related to the case, and presents a strange DeCastro made no mistake when he misidentified the officer who allegedly struck him in the groin defense.

While all of these issues will likely be rehashed if the 9th Circuit picks up DeCastro’s appeal of the lawsuit, it is uncertain how they will impact the awarding of fees and costs in the lawsuit.

Next up, DeCastro got not one but two rare wins on Wednesday when Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler granted him the ability to do early discovery in his case against twenty John Doe police officers.

Judge Weksler wrote:

“Here, Plaintiff has established good cause for early discovery. First, Plaintiff has identified the Doe defendants with sufficient specificity so the court can determine they are real persons who can be sued in federal court. See ECF No. 1 at 2–3. Second, Plaintiff has identified the steps he has undertaken to locate and identify the defendants. See ECF No. 7 at 2. Third, Plaintiff has sufficiently pleaded claims for relief against the doe defendants.1 See generally ECF No. 1. And fourth, the discovery Plaintiff requests—contacting the appropriate State agencies through court-authorized discovery requests—is reasonably likely to lead to identifying information that will permit service of process. ECF No. 7 at 3.”

She also granted him his 90-day extension to serve the defendants in the lawsuit.

DeCastro got further good news on Wednesday as he sold another three pack of his YouVeGotBail.AI product for $99. This brings total units sold over the past week and a half since launch to 19 units.

Finally, none of DeCastro’s associated GoFundMe campaigns saw donations for Thursday.

YouTuber Zachary “Liberty Troll” Kueker won the day with $256.00 going to his Support the Fight For Our Constitutional Rights campaign.

The First Amendment Protection Agency placed second with $ 130.00 going to his ILLEGAL ARREST DEFENSE FUND!!! Campaign.

Kueker returned to place third with $50.00 in donations to his Stand with Liberty Against Unjust charges fund.

SeanPaul “Long Island Audit” Reyes placed fourth with $10.00 in new donations to his Detained for MY Rights – Continuing the Fight for OUR Rights fund.

In last place, Jonathan “Frauditor Troll” Hudon-Huneault’s Help us Fight this anti-free speech retaliation lawsuit campaign lost $26.00 in value despite having a $27.00 CAD donation in the past 24 hours.

This is a continuing news story.

Related Links and PDFS

DeCastro v. Clark County CourtListener Page

PDF: 26-Response to Motion to Stay Discovery

PDF: 27-Notice of Change of Address

DeCastro v. LVMPD CourtListener Page

PDF: 166-Response to Motion for Attorney Fees

DeCastro v. Doe CourtListener Page

8-Order on Time Extension (Text only)

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 3/25/2026. Plaintiff has moved for an extension of time to serve the summons and complaint on the Defendants. (ECF No. 6). Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion. Plaintiff shall have until 6/23/2026 to serve its summons and complaint. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF – KNH) (Entered: 03/25/2026)

PDF: 9-Order on Early Discovery

Locally Stored PDFs

DeCastro v. Peter – Notice of Case Reassignment
DeCastro v. Peter – Notice of Change of Address (2 Pages)
DeCastro v. Peter – Notice of Filing Appeal – 3-24-26 (2 pages)
DeCastro v. Peter – Notice of Service – 3-24-26

Crowd Sourcing Results

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky

Like this:

Like Loading…
Tags: Chille DeCastroDeleteLawzJose DeCastro
Share196Tweet123
Jim

Jim

Jim Finch is an accomplished journalist and writer of things. He currently resides in Cogan Station, PA, where he is continuing his love affair with the Seattle Mariners and Seattle Seahawks. He also likes to confuse people with his entries in biographical fields.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Home
  • Animal Needs Campaign
  • CashApp
  • GoFundMe
  • PayPal
  • StreamElements
Join our nighty chats!

Copyright © 2026 Jim Finch

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
    • Newscast
    • Editorials
  • Music
  • Site News
  • Comics
  • Ratfarts!
  • Donate
    • Animal Needs Campaign
    • CashApp
    • GoFundMe
    • PayPal
    • StreamElements

Copyright © 2026 Jim Finch

%d