Sunday saw a crazy end to the weekend of surprise statements from the on-going conflict between Kate Peter, Grant Smith Ellis and “Turtleboy” Aidan Kearney as all three released statements to end the weekend.
Starting with Ellis, who wrote on Twitter: “Well, here’s an update I did not expect to report;
#KatePeter (AKA MafiaMasshole) has apparently bragged about violating an active HPO (by sending multiple junk removal companies to Aiden #TurtleBoy Kearney’s new home) in front of numerous people, and was proud of doing so.
Peter already faces a bail revocation hearing this month related to violating that order on another occasion.”
Kate Peter addressed conspiracies in her statement, writing, “You people want to will some sort of grand conspiracy into existence but it’s not going to happen. It’s not real. No one framed either Aidan or Karen for anything. Aidan Kearney and Karen Read both are retards who committed crimes and thoroughly memorialized said crimes while also talking about them (with 45 different versions of the “truth”) in text with multiple people, recording, screenshotting and blabbing every step of the way. Everyone can dig all the way to fucking China you’re never going to find any evidence of any crazy setups except for the ones Aidan and Karen have attempted to orchestrate, both cooperatively and independently.”
Finally, Turtleboy Kearney retweeted his lawyer, Mark Bederow’s twitter post: “Lately I have seen a barrage of sensational posts and “legal analysis” by self-styled journalists, a retired law enforcement officer, and avowed enemies and haters of @DoctorTurtleboy regarding his alleged misdeeds and activities. These post include claims of an ongoing investigation into alleged sexual abuse, an ongoing investigation into a conspiracy to intimidate witnesses in another criminal case, and a tired and repeated claim of a relationship with law enforcement. The people posting are not in a position to have credible information or properly vet what they claim to be true. These claims are unequivocally false, misleading and without any credible basis to be reported as “fact.” To the extent anyone considers this “journalism,” it is lazy, biased and irresponsible. These claims are being created out of whole cloth (in certain cases towel) and/or by exploiting cherry-picked information from unreliable “sources” who are either non-existent or who supply cherry-picked information which is purposely used to disseminate information out of context. Much of the reported “facts” are demonstrably false and easily disproven in the proper forum, which is not people hiding behind keyboards on Twitter/X who constantly yell at each other. Put simply, disseminating allegations “per sources,” while attaching cherry-picked “analysis” and documentation is not journalism; it is activism by people with an agenda of seeking attention/validation from others and/or those seeking to settle a score. These posts should be treated by serious people in that context: unreliable and not credible information being provided by biased people with well-known motive to seriously damage another person’s credibility. Wait for credible information from credible people who base their information on credible sources of information. Certainly much will be revealed in sourced public court filings and public proceedings in court, which remains the best source for any information about a criminal case.”
All three have been fairly quiet on Monday, with no signs of new flare ups in the on-going conflicts between the trio.
We’ll continue to monitor the situation and report if the silence is broken.
